As Christopher Daniels reminded me in his recent article on historical sources, it’s forty years since we wrote out first article on history education. Not only does that means that we’re both growing disgracefully older but that, in the interim, little has changed in the ways that examination boards approach the evaluation of sources. Particularly, and this is the core of Chris’ paper, visual sources are still largely ignored when assessing students. In fact, perusing some old examination papers and comparing them with today’s equivalent, the types of sources used has barely changed at all. What visual material there is is generally in black-and-white rather than colour, the norm in say Geography papers.